![Photo](http://forums.netduino.com/uploads/av-2.png?_r=0)
Shield Base Firmware (beta 6)
#1
Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:59 AM
- Juergen likes this
#2
Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:06 AM
Thank you, Chris.
NO more "checkiing your hardware". Worry free.
#3
Posted 26 January 2013 - 11:47 AM
#4
Posted 26 January 2013 - 03:50 PM
Multiple shield bases will be enabled later this winter/spring. OneWire will be the first new feature we add to Shield Base after that. ChrisJust wondered if there is an estimated date for multiple shield base support? Also any ideas on the 1-wire support on shield base?
#5
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:04 PM
Hi Chris;
I am getting an execution error when running the program to upgrade the shield base. Advise?
#6
Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:04 AM
Hi Chris;
Here the error I am getting when updating the baseshield.
Any Advise
bool GetAck() { if (_isDisposed) throw new ObjectDisposedException();
byte[] readBuffer = new byte[1]; int bytesRead = 0;
bytesRead = _serialPort.Read(readBuffer, 0, readBuffer.Length);
if (bytesRead == 0) throw new Exception(); // timeout exception
if (readBuffer[0] == 0x79) return true; else if (readBuffer[0] == 0x1F) <-- here it is where the error happen the buffer value is 128 return false; else throw new Exception(); // invalid byte <-- throw this exception }
Attached Files
#7
Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:32 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2013 - 02:48 AM
Hi Chris;
I used to different cables (provided with the Netduino) connected to Port 5, the only module connected was the base shield; in both cases I got same error.
#9
Posted 14 February 2013 - 07:25 AM
#10
Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:09 PM
Chris;
Unfortunately exactly same error.
Could be an issue that I upgraded the Netduino Go to 4.2.2 before trying to upgrade the Base Shield,
Thanks
#11
Posted 16 February 2013 - 08:10 PM
#12
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:51 AM
Hi Chris;
Unfortunately not, I can't tell you if it was OK before the upgrade; today I tried a small test application using Nwazet Touch screen but it halt without giving an error (inside a Try Catch block), I tried with different port (5,4 and 1) with same result.
Thanks
#13
Posted 20 February 2013 - 01:11 PM
![:(](http://forums.netduino.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png)
#14
Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:35 PM
Folks, help please
#15
Posted 21 February 2013 - 12:13 AM
Okay, that's a different issue. Let's try to solve that first. The newer firmware for Netduino Go uses the USB name "Netduino" instead of "NetduinoGo". Open up project properties and go to the .NET Micro Framework tab. Change the transport from USB to Serial and then back to USB again, to make sure that it sees "NetduinoGo_Netduino" as the deployment target. Then save the project and try to deploy again. Does that get your Netduino Go up and running? ChrisGet error in a beginning to re flash Shield Base, even not able to reach a point to push button on Go Error 1 Device not found or cannot be opened - USB:NetduinoGo Heeeeeeeelp
#16
Posted 21 February 2013 - 02:47 AM
Chris thx, this worked, but then I got exception here in STM32Bootloader.cs
#17
Posted 21 February 2013 - 02:53 AM
Ok, it worked from bus #4
Chris, is there some reason?
#18
Posted 19 March 2013 - 03:32 PM
NGO with SB doesn't work independently on it's own power supply, Each time to start the app I have to connect to computer and load program from VS C#
#19
Posted 25 March 2013 - 04:51 PM
That was weird. I had issues deploying the updated firmware to the shieldbase. I am using a Windows 8 machine, VS 2013, net framework 4.3, Go Firmware 4.2.2.1.
Tried several times to Debug the application but it would not connect to the Go over USB, kept doing iterations to connect. In frustration, I then just deployed the solution, which worked ok. Then I started debugging and it worked fine.
#20
Posted 15 September 2013 - 10:41 PM
I had the same issue where I had to flash the base from port 4 instead of port 5 as well for whatever reason.
When will the shield base be moving to SPI so the extra three ports aren't wasted?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users