Find contentAnyone?
- Netduino Forums
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: Se3ker
The Netduino forums have been replaced by new forums at community.wildernesslabs.co.
This site has been preserved for archival purposes only
and the ability to make new accounts or posts has been turned off.
Community Stats
- Group Members
- Active Posts 16
- Profile Views 4771
- Member Title Member
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Not Telling
1
Neutral
User Tools
Friends
Se3ker hasn't added any friends yet.
Posts I've Made
In Topic: DSP capabilities?
22 October 2014 - 08:44 PM
In Topic: Windows on Devices? When?
21 September 2014 - 07:40 AM
I also think more effort should be made to NETMF, nontheless we had talk about what platform to use for our new project and it was a close one between arduino and netmf, the programming ease won over a slight price increase, we will continue to use it for more complex projects until NETMF is no longer relevant.
I think a mod should really close this thread..
I think a mod should really close this thread..
In Topic: Windows on Devices? When?
13 September 2014 - 08:26 AM
That's exactly right, no one board fits them all.
Although I prefer to work with .NET MF, cheapest chip is about $7 - $10 and above that can fit it.
And I know you are probably all about putting windows on devices but what about the lowest tier, I would like to have a higher programming language even on that tier.
For instance I'm now using an ATTiny85 to do some LED lighting, the chip is about $0.8 - $1.2, and can run what I would call a subset of Arduino.
Only this is supported:
The following Arduino commands should be supported:
- pinMode()
- digitalWrite()
- digitalRead()
- analogRead()
- analogWrite()
- shiftOut()
- pulseIn()
- millis()
- micros()
- delay()
- delayMicroseconds()
- SoftwareSerial (has been updated in Arduino 1.0)
My question is can .NET MF go in a similar way, maybe have some bits available and others not, and deliverable through NuGet??
I.E. i would need analogRead and analogWrite, and maybe Threading, but don't need BitConverter, any of the GUI stuff and Networking etc.
Also as a side question is it even possible to recompile the source to do something like that now, or are the bits too much interconnected.
In Topic: Windows on Devices? When?
07 September 2014 - 08:08 AM
Not from my own experience, as I don't use RTOS on any Arduino, but quick check reveals that ChibiOS, BeRTOS, FreeRTOS support AVR (and there is about 40 more in the Wikipedia list that mentions AVR).
Yes but its not there by default, i dont know how to use it.
Also i dont really care how its called, i have a device that needs to monitor 3 sensors at different intervals, turn on a few mosfets at different intervals and listen for wireless all the time. Its HARD to do completely right without bugs or lags on an arduino. On netduino i just have 7 threads and they all run fine.
In Topic: Windows on Devices? When?
04 September 2014 - 10:18 PM
Well arduino still doesn't have RTOS, Threading or whatever... to do 5 things simultaneously without frying your brain with spaghetti code and millis. And multiple requests and discussions on forums resulting not in "when will we make it, it will be this year or some year" but in "do we really need a RTOS", yeah that really inspires much more confidence.
Just an out of topic no trolling intended thing, but as much as I approve opensource I do not believe in it not 1%, you cannot rely on a community driven product, starts cheap and free but if your not ready to commit all your resources 120%, its a flop, assuming you have the resources (manpower). maybe that's the .NET MF problem currently. Id rather pay a licence/tools for it and have it a 1st class citizen in the Microsoft ecosystem then this.
- Netduino Forums
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: Se3ker
- Privacy Policy
