Netduino home hardware projects downloads community

Jump to content


The Netduino forums have been replaced by new forums at community.wildernesslabs.co. This site has been preserved for archival purposes only and the ability to make new accounts or posts has been turned off.

richhas

Member Since 08 Oct 2013
Offline Last Active Jan 08 2017 07:01 AM
-----

Topics I've Started

N+2: Remote debugging over TCP/IP?

25 December 2014 - 06:52 AM

Hi all,

 

Swapping back in an N+2 project from months ago...

 

Can someone tell me if remote debugging via VS of N+2 apps is possible over a tcp/ip network?

 

Thanks,

 

Rich


Making the PK more friendly

31 December 2013 - 11:13 PM

Dear SL folks,

 

Background: I have spent a good deal of time messing around with various GCC versions and trying to get clean 4.2 PK builds with SL's corresponding FW bits. I'm building a custom lighting and controls system around extended I2c buses and such and attempting to use ND2+ as part of this system - I must be able to debug, support, and extend the native bits that SL ships.

 

I'm currently using CooCox (CoIDE), GCC 4.8.3,  ST-LinkV2 under windows 7 64-bit as a dev env. All this works great for bottoms up native dev just using the various ARM CMCIS-based sources and my code. The problem is of course when I want to pull in the NETMF PK work. It is a tangled mess because of the of all the various runtime targets and compilers that MS and the NETMF community are trying to support - all understood. But here I am just trying to focus on your product and my application of it and I must try and sort out all this PK and tool chain stuff. Can something better be done...

 

A few questions and then a suggestion...

 

1) Does SL verify/test their released (firmware) extensions to the PK with a given GCC tool chain?

2) Do you prescribe a workable version of a GCC tool chain?

3) If you do either, could you freeze a workable tool set when you guys ship new bits that will 100% work and build the PK+your bits? IOWs consider this aspect as part of your product.

4) Can you tell us exactly what your internal tools chain is that you guys use?

 

And now a suggestion...

 

A profiled down PK+SL set of bits and build-ware as a supported "product" is worth some money - I would have spent a couple hundred just for the SL-guarantee. Such a hassle-free NetPK-SL package would be very useful and would go a long way in opening up your products to much deeper application IMHO.

 

Just some thoughts... And I've been a fan for several years and own many of your boards.

 

If I could figure out how to send a PM to Chris, I would have done that. A bit new to the forum.

 

Thanks,

 

Richard Hasha

 

(richhasha@gmail.com; richhas@microsoft.com)

 

 


home    hardware    projects    downloads    community    where to buy    contact Copyright © 2016 Wilderness Labs Inc.  |  Legal   |   CC BY-SA
This webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.