Evaluating the NGo
#1
Posted 12 October 2012 - 04:03 AM
#2
Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:10 AM
What kind of product are you looking to build? Are you using Netduino Go for prototyping--or do you want to include it in your finished product?
Our target date to complete the beta and enable up to 8 shield bases per mainboard is December.1. I see that the shieldbase now supports spi which is one of the things I needed; now all I really need still from the shieldbase is to be able to use more than one. Is it possible to get an idea of when it might be moved over?
We expect both of these to ship this quarter.2. Next is when are the SD and Ethernet modules expected to be available
We'll start testing hub functionality using the wireless hub feature in Q1 (using 2+ Netduino Go mainboards with XBee modules). The physical hub hardware should be available in Q1/Q2 2013.3. The last thing worth of hardware is probably the biggest need which is the Hub. I see that it's supposed to be with GoBus 2.0? Somewhere I believe I saw that it's estimated at early next year? Is there any way to get one early maybe? (I'd be willing to help test it alongside building this)
The 384KB of flash and 100+KB of RAM have worked out to be plenty for the vast majority of projects. No announced plans for a higher-end Netduino Go at this time.I also so in another thread someone asking about increased RAM and mention of making a higher end NGO mainboard if demand was there. I'd be willing to look into that as I might be pushing the limits of the mainboard for this project but that’s not as big of a priority for me at the moment.
Yes, that's correct. We'll be updating this to auto-detect modules in the future as well.The other thing I would like to know isn’t about hardware. I see from the shieldbase update that basically what’s happening if I understand this correctly is when you run that project its putting a program on the board that takes with it the resources that are the flash files it needs to update the shieldbase. When you hit the button it then updates a shieldbase attached to port 5. In looking at it you can update it on any port by telling it which one it’s connected to?
We could definitely support something along these lines. There may be some limitations to this, but we intend to enable the simplest and most powerful re-flashing scenarios that we can support.Will you be able to do something similar to update a module attached to the hub either by basically loading an app on the mainboard that flashes the hub that then flashes the module then after the modules are updated it then flashes the hub back with its firmware to run or will the hub just pass through whatever runs on the mainboard to flash the module.
That is one of our goals. We are doing some testing to see what we can support.Is it also possible to automate updating the mainboard basically so you can have one program to loop over all the modules including those attached to the hubs and update them then all in some sequence that ends with all modules updated, the hubs updated and the mainboard updated.
You can't necessarily update the mainboard firmware using MFDeployEngine, but you can script ST's tools as well.I understand that you can update program on the mainboard with MFDeployEngine but can you automate updating the firmware.
If you'd like more details on any of the above, just let me know! Thanks for the great questions
Chris
#3
Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:19 AM
#4
Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:55 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users